Last edited by a moderator:
Looks identical to the U.S. Target version with the addition of a booklet.Thanks @pbtour4il !
CC, yep, looks that way-he contributed info for our members looking for various eds of Interstellar-a little thank you was in orderLooks identical to the U.S. Target version with the addition of a booklet.
(And the Target has 2 Blu discs and 1 DVD)
Agreed, DB! There will be A LOT of INTERSTELLARs coming, I think!!CC, yep, looks that way-he contributed info for our members looking for various eds of Interstellar-a little thank you was in order
Let us hope there are more worthy pickups. Some nice ones already....gone for FS Steel, UK Digi and Neo from WM myself...part of me screams "NO MAS!" lol.Agreed, DB! There will be A LOT of INTERSTELLARs coming, I think!!
@digitalbabeLet us hope there are more worthy pickups. Some nice ones already....gone for FS Steel, UK Digi and Neo from WM myself...part of me screams "NO MAS!" lol.
IF the JP has a booklet that the Target version does not- I'll call it a wash - because that will probably be the same booklet I will be getting in the Walmart Neo Pack.The thing is if JP edition isn't have anything extra special, might not be ordering since the price is quite expensive than others...
One HDN Member mentioned that the domestic (U.S.) Paramount distribution and transfer may differ from the (European) Warner Bros. distribution and transfer, inferring that the Domestic Paramount versions tend to have better quality transfers. (If I find the thread, post, and member who wrote that I'll post an edit.)
I believe he means in US the film would be distributed by Paramount and be likely have the better/superior transfer while Europe would be Warner Bros. which may have inferior transfer...Euuuuu @C.C. 95 Can you translate that in english for me
Transfers don't all come from the same source. Example: it is well known that Japan's transfer of T2 is the gold standard, while other transfers of the same movie have been made from more inferior materials.but what does that mean ''and be likely to have superior transfer...'' I am not getting the transfer part I feel not too bright right now
@Actarus,@C.C. 95 Thanks so much for that explanation, but now that we are so far ahead and already some heading towards 4K, wouldn't it be a standard to have it done as you say from Progressive source like Paramount will do in North America ? so since it has been said that the Warner version is inferior quality, does that mean they used Blu rays from interlaced sources ?
Am I getting this right ? And is this something we should be concern with in this day and age on a regular basis ?
@Actarus you bet! I am nothing, if not a vessel of useless trivia! (Truth, I've worked in just about every area of A/V conceivable for the last 28 years).@C.C. 95 WOW Thank you for all that information, it is great to know a bit more. I thank you for your time it took to explain all that to me. And yes I agree, even though I know nothing about it, I also tell/told myself that HD 1080p is so amazing in resolution that how much more can you get. And for the James Cameron comment/paraphrasing on 4K being like taking away the illusion of the movie I can understand what he means, we still like to see that it is a film that we are watching. Thanks for explaining the interlacing and Progressive transfers but I guess I don' think it really matters with the advanced blu-rays and Tvs we have in this day and age. I have never been disappointed in a Blu-ray movie. So even if one would technically be better than the other one, I don't think it really matters when we are at this much resolution for a Blu-ray...well for me anyways. But you as you say no one is putting out interlaced BD's anymore so that should not be a concern. Thanks again 1000 times for the info !!! you are great ! I will look at that article for sure