Last edited:
Most people work in RGB and printers usually work in CMYK so there is some colour mismatch and certain colours are a nightmare. Prussian blue and British racing green are two good examples.You could be right. I only come from a photographic background: not industrial printing, but it’s something you become aware of when using photoshop for work. Most people don’t know what CMYK is or Pantone so seems a bit pretentious to make a big thing out of it. But basically a lot of printing colours are “owned” by Pantone as crazy as it sounds. So yes a colour matching thing but also a copyright issue.
Absolutely!Most people work in RGB and printers usually work in CMYK so there is some colour mismatch and certain colours are a nightmare. Prussian blue and British racing green are two good examples.
You’re mocking us aren’t you? Haha. This is the reason why some steelbooks look different in different regions etc. no care taken to ensure what is on the screen gets to the final product.Absolutely!
Yes, in printing terms anyway. Madness! not A recent thing either.Colors are 'owned' now...
![]()
You're joking now, but that'll be the next step, after subscriptions for car seat warming function, and app ads removal, they'll be scanning your iris everywhere, like in Minority Report, and billing you for breathing copyrighted scents.Racing Green, there I said it, oh what's that ... sh!te, just been invoiced a pound for copyright and using someones trademark, I didn't even use the colour![]()
Might look better in the dark. sorry I had tooHmm yeah, the colours look very dull/muted there. It looked fine on the sample they shared last month though, so is it just a case of different lighting maybe??