I know it's only an opinion but c'mon, player, are you really claiming that Nomak was a more compelling adversary than Deacon Frost? I must emphatically disagree.I'm a tad confused as to why Blade 2 wouldn't be the first to received a 4K release date as opposed to Blade 1. Blade 2 generated more revenue and was a better movie in my opinion. Nomak was a better villain and a greater threat to Blade than Deacon Frost in my opinion.
Blade 1 i will watch over and over without any hesitation. Blade 2 i have force myself to watch it if I am really desperate.I know it's only an opinion but c'mon, player, are you really claiming that Nomak was a more compelling adversary than Deacon Frost? I must emphatically disagree.
blade 1 is totally awesomeI'm a tad confused as to why Blade 2 wouldn't be the first to received a 4K release date as opposed to Blade 1. Blade 2 generated more revenue and was a better movie in my opinion. Nomak was a better villain and a greater threat to Blade than Deacon Frost in my opinion.
I have quite a few friends that feel the way you do --- so you won't get an argument from me. However, look at the box office numbers (domestically and overseas), I believe that says it all. Numbers may not give your the entire story, but they don't lie either. Blade 2 rocks: Better action, scary villain and a better movie altogether...again in my opinion. It fit more of the comic book aesthetics the creators/writers of the series were looking for, per David Goyer and Wesley Snipes. That being said, they were both great movies within the Action/Horror genres, which I enjoyed a great deal. Nomak, the head reaper, was terrifying with his Predator mouth (homage to the Predator series)...Too bad Blade 3, Trinity, did not live up to the standards of it's predecessors. I thought it was trying to be a comedy instead of what the series was intended to be, an action/horror movie. Blade 3 was a real disappointment.I know it's only an opinion but c'mon, player, are you really claiming that Nomak was a more compelling adversary than Deacon Frost? I must emphatically disagree.
I have quite a few friends that feel the way you do --- so you won't get an argument from me. However, look at the box office numbers (domestically and overseas), I believe that says it all. Numbers may not give you the entire story, but they don't lie either. Blade 2 rocks: Better action, scary villain and a better movie altogether...again in my opinion. It fit more of the comic book aesthetics the creators/writers of the series were looking for, per David Goyer and Wesley Snipes. That being said, they are both great movies within the Action/Horror genre. Nomak, the head reaper, was terrifying with his Predator-like mouth (homage to the Predator series)...Too bad Blade 3, Trinity, did not live up to the standards of its predecessors. I thought it was trying to be a comedy instead of an action/horror movie...Blade 3 was a real disappointment.I know it's only an opinion but c'mon, player, are you really claiming that Nomak was a more compelling adversary than Deacon Frost? I must emphatically disagree.
Not really, the people that went out to see the film at cinemas didn't know it's quality before watching.I have quite a few friends that feel the way you do --- so you won't get an argument from me. However, look at the box office numbers (domestically and overseas), I believe that says it all.
Revenue never tells the entire story. However; it never lies --- either emphatic or not. "Once they finish with us, who do you think they'll turn on next (rhetorical)? Your preceious humans, not one of them will be left".I know it's only an opinion but c'mon, player, are you really claiming that Nomak was a more compelling adversary than Deacon Frost? I must emphatically disagree.
Box office is a measure of how many people SAW a movie.I have quite a few friends that feel the way you do --- so you won't get an argument from me. However, look at the box office numbers (domestically and overseas), I believe that says it all. Numbers may not give your the entire story, but they don't lie either. Blade 2 rocks: Better action, scary villain and a better movie altogether...again in my opinion. It fit more of the comic book aesthetics the creators/writers of the series were looking for, per David Goyer and Wesley Snipes. That being said, they were both great movies within the Action/Horror genres, which I enjoyed a great deal. Nomak, the head reaper, was terrifying with his Predator mouth (homage to the Predator series)...Too bad Blade 3, Trinity, did not live up to the standards of it's predecessors. I thought it was trying to be a comedy instead of what the series was intended to be, an action/horror movie. Blade 3 was a real disappointment.
Strategically, Decon Frost was a better villain... However, theatrically (and from an action/horror perspective), Nomak hands down.