It's not about shock value at all when it was trying to be "realistic". Especially if you're referring to the animals. There's nothing really shocking about animals being killed and eaten by a tribe in a jungle. I mean, we do it here, and in worse ways...



I know what your saying but I was talking more about the turtle scene and animal torture. Even when tribes kill animals its not in cruel ways they want to kill and eat them as fast as possible, normally you would kill first before ripping its shell apart. The fact that they did all this with real living animals for a B horror film that doesen't add to the film in my opinion one way or another except for the fact of saying OH **** they are slaughtering real living animals in this movie and the human deaths are so convincing the Director was questioned by the authorities over it, says something about the film. Its almost like your watching a snuff film or something, call it artistic film making all you want, or a cinematic genious for his cinematography tricks but to me anyone who thinks up a movie and the way the scenes played out in this movie has something wrong with them mentally. Normal minds don't think like this and thats why its so difficult for most to stomach. my .02 cents
Do you any proof backing up how turtles are killed and eaten by amazonian tribes? Because for one thing, most people don't kill an animal and then immediately eat it, so the "as fast as possible thing" simply isn't correct. Chances are they would have killed it and then brought it back with them.
Also the fact is the crew DID consult with a tribe. The monkey scene? They weren't going to do that, whatever the tribe they were working with suggested it because monkey brain is a delicacy or whatever for them. I doubt the director said "alright guys, go find a turtle and then do something to it".
But, again, do you know how OUR "civilized meat" is made? Vastly more cruel than chopping up a turtle, but I don't see people getting upset about people eating hamburgers in movies. It's the classic "lets show sad looking kids crying to sarah mclachlan music" for donations tactic, people don't actually care about something and only pretend they do when they actually see it.
Animal torture scenes aside, this films fairly tame compared to some of the modern underground horror films.
Is this a new transfer? Or just another re-release in new packaging?
It's just the rawness and realism of it, masterpiece In that sense but sickening to watch, I can watch the most gory bloody heads flying film and it don't bother me something about this movie that messes with your emotions, it's all the torture and **** combined or something. Eli Roth might try and recapture this grittiness but it's not the same.
Animal torture scenes aside, this films fairly tame compared to some of the modern underground horror films.
Is this a new transfer? Or just another re-release in new packaging?

Grindhouse have used a new transfer with imo superior PQ to the already existing releases...![]()
i think what pyschoscot was talking about are modern underground horror flicks like "august underground", "murder set pieces", "snuff 102" or asian CATIII movies like the "guinea pig" series...
eli roth is very mainstream and a "softie" compared to that.
some of the mentioned flicks go way too far even for my own taste.
with "cannibal holocaust", i felt very shaken too after watching it, but i was prepared for that, it's intended by the director, and sometimes it's exactly what i want from a film.
I was shaken and sickened after watching August Underground and thought it was a found-footage masterpiece. Although I wouldn't call Eli Roth a softie, if early reviews of The Green Inferno are accurate.
what can I say, I'm a sick puppy! Mordum the 2nd one makes Cannibal Holocaust look like a Disney cartoon! 