Megalopolis - In theaters September 27, 2024

Space Cadet

[ sexy wolfchild ]
BANNED
Premium Supporter
Nov 26, 2017
8,361
3.00 star(s) Rating: 3.00/5 2 Votes
Title: Megalopolis

Genre: Drama, Science Fiction

Director: Francis Ford Coppola

Cast: Adam Driver, Nathalie Emmanuel, Laurence Fishburne, Shia LaBeouf, Giancarlo Esposito, Talia Shire, Aubrey Plaza, Jon Voight, Forest Whitaker, Jason Schwartzman, Grace VanderWaal, Kathryn Hunter, James Remar, Chloe Fineman, Isabelle Kusman, D.B. Sweeney, Bailey Ives, Dustin Hoffman, Adams Bellouis, Madeleine Gardella, Donald Pitts, Art Newkirk, Rachel Wolf

Plot: An architect wants to rebuild New York City as a utopia following a devastating disaster.
 
I honestly think this looks awful. Looks like it's trying to be the next Matrix, but is instead Jupiter Ascending.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Billy Talent
I honestly think this looks awful. Looks like it's trying to be the next Matrix, but is instead Jupiter Ascending.
Planning to be there on opening night @Noodles? :naughty:

I've not seen Jupiter Ascending, but I don't think anyone said good things about it... you are probably right with your instincts here.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Noodles
Planning to be there on opening night @Noodles? :naughty:

I've not seen Jupiter Ascending, but I don't think anyone said good things about it... you are probably right with your instincts here.
Lol I don't even go to the cinema to see movies I am looking forward to. Too damn expensive!

I reluctantly watched JA and it's now one of those movies where I base my enjoyment of other films around.
 
Lol I don't even go to the cinema to see movies I am looking forward to. Too damn expensive!
I paid around £120 for the year for Odeon Limitless. Get to go as many times as I like and isense (4k atmos), advanced screening, recliner option, all included in price. I average 4-5 a month the last year( works out around £2/£3 per ticket) but even once-a-month and you're saving!

I'd recommend to anyone m8 :thumbs:
 
I paid around £130 for the year for Odeon Limitless. Get to go as many times as I like and isense (4k atmos), advanced screening, recliner option, all included in price. I average 4-5 a month the last year( works out around £2/£3 per ticket) but even once-a-month and you're saving!

I'd recommend to anyone m8 :thumbs:
That's obviously very decent if you have the time to go on a regular basis. My local Odeon is awful though... proper filthy and the screens are just terrible. Next closest cinema to me is a 40 minute car journey away, and I don't drive, so it means me pestering someone to give me a lift. Either that or I catch the bus, which last time I checked was almost 2 hours long with 2 separate buses... I can barely manage 10 mins on public transport without wanting to punch someone :punch:
 
That's obviously very decent if you have the time to go on a regular basis. My local Odeon is awful though... proper filthy and the screens are just terrible. Next closest cinema to me is a 40 minute car journey away, and I don't drive, so it means me pestering someone to give me a lift. Either that or I catch the bus, which last time I checked was almost 2 hours long with 2 separate buses... I can barely manage 10 mins on public transport without wanting to punch someone :punch:
Yeah that's fair enough, can't be doing with dirty cinemas. If I'm honest, if you don't live in and around the Midlands it isn't as good value imo. All the plush all-recliner Odeon Luxes seem to be centred here. I can't go the cinema now without a recliner but certainly would avoid a bus to sit in filth regardless. Hopefully they renovate more like your local. I have noticed 1 or 2 more popping up London way, so there's hope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Noodles
Yeah that's fair enough, can't be doing with dirty cinemas. If I'm honest, if you don't live in and around the Midlands it isn't as good value imo. All the plush all-recliner Odeon Luxes seem to be centred here. I can't go the cinema now without a recliner but certainly would avoid a bus to sit in filth regardless. Hopefully they renovate more like your local. I have noticed 1 or 2 more popping up London way, so there's hope.
Tbf it's been ages since I last went to my local, but the experiences I did have there were enough to put me off for life! My next closest one is in Derby and that's a Luxe. Really nice cinema and actually a lot cheaper than my local that doesn't even have Luxe and only recently just got an IMAX screen. Some years back it was reported that my local was the most expensive outside of London... no idea why as it has nothing to show for it and it's not exactly popular.
 
I just returned from Beetlejuice Beetlejuice, and seeing the trailer on the big screen, I'm intrigued to see it. Oh dystopian sci-fi, how you tug at my curiosity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bunk
Just watched this, and it might be the strangest film I've ever seen. There are line deliveries and physical actions in this film that I honestly think have never happened before. I am going to be thinking about it at random moments for years. Is it good? What does good even mean? I don't know any more. It's incredibly pretentious and about as subtle as a grenade, but it's so interesting at the same time. Highly recommend it but there's no guarentee that anyone will like it. I'm not even sure I do.
 
I have just watched this too. I didn't love it, but I certainly can say I didn't hate it. I found it pretentious for the first half, but the second half resonated more with me, unsure If I managed by then to let go of the Roman and future aesthetic and be more engaged where it was going with its topian ending. Yes, I didn't side with either dystopian or utopian sci-fi, as that dear reader, is your decision to make if and when you watch it.
 
Mark Kermode was praising Shia LaBeef's performance
Leonardo Dicaprio Lol GIF
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Noodles
I was always going to see this film no matter what I would read - I read and heard relatively little on purpose beforehand. This guy made some of my favourite movies (Apocalypse Now arguably being in my Top 5) and the sheer concept of this film and it's background just seemed really intriguing.

Even though it's Coppola I went in with Zero point Zero expectations - None at all. I'm not exaggerating when I say that this was one of the worst films I've ever seen. Like, for real. I sometimes had to hold back laughing so hard that I almost cried because the whole situation was just so unreal. Coppola, the ensemble, the stupid and childish dialogue, the horrible acting, the terrible writing mixed with the fact that it was shot like a Perfume commercial (which I usually kinda like) - it just had me howling at 2 or 3 points. It was like one of those fake movies in Tropic Thunder: Simple Jack and the other one with Downey Jr as a gay priest. Only that this film was an actual movie by Francis Ford mfing Coppola. At some point however I got kinda angry at the film, not because of what was shown in that moment. Some of the things I heard months and months ago, that Coppola was wreckless on set, spend whole days in his trailer smoking joints and rewriting the script and the cast and crew being on hold, and everyone saying 'Well, he's the guy who made Godfather, he can do that if he wants. Godfather was a sh*tshow too and look how that turned out!' - well obviously the film turned out exactly as it sounded from these stories about him on set. In one scene towards the ending involving Aubrey Plaza which had again absolutely ridiculous dialogue I could have sworn to have seen a held back grin by Aubrey in multiple instances, as if she knew how bad this dialogue was. But hey, it's 85 year old Coppola, let him cook! Add to that that they put 'See it in IMAX' into the first trailers at a time IMAX hadn't even agreed to distribution yet, the fact that they MADE UP press quotes and put it in the trailer followed by many apologies by the production team, the fact Coppola says that he knows that the film will be a cult classic in 20 years. As bitter as it may sound, but it's time to leave the stage, old man. Because obviously even the once great geniuses of cinema can't save this artform from the predicament it is currently in.

The film felt like nothing more than a mere indulgence for a once great filmmaker who wanted to get one last taste of a 'big time movie' after having spend decades making obscure indie films that no one has seen - just like this one from the looks of the box office. It's a pseudo-intellectual, honestly childish and immaturely written, badly acted and even worse thought out insult at the legacy of a once great artist.
 
I was always going to see this film no matter what I would read - I read and heard relatively little on purpose beforehand. This guy made some of my favourite movies (Apocalypse Now arguably being in my Top 5) and the sheer concept of this film and it's background just seemed really intriguing.

Even though it's Coppola I went in with Zero point Zero expectations - None at all. I'm not exaggerating when I say that this was one of the worst films I've ever seen. Like, for real. I sometimes had to hold back laughing so hard that I almost cried because the whole situation was just so unreal. Coppola, the ensemble, the stupid and childish dialogue, the horrible acting, the terrible writing mixed with the fact that it was shot like a Perfume commercial (which I usually kinda like) - it just had me howling at 2 or 3 points. It was like one of those fake movies in Tropic Thunder: Simple Jack and the other one with Downey Jr as a gay priest. Only that this film was an actual movie by Francis Ford mfing Coppola. At some point however I got kinda angry at the film, not because of what was shown in that moment. Some of the things I heard months and months ago, that Coppola was wreckless on set, spend whole days in his trailer smoking joints and rewriting the script and the cast and crew being on hold, and everyone saying 'Well, he's the guy who made Godfather, he can do that if he wants. Godfather was a sh*tshow too and look how that turned out!' - well obviously the film turned out exactly as it sounded from these stories about him on set. In one scene towards the ending involving Aubrey Plaza which had again absolutely ridiculous dialogue I could have sworn to have seen a held back grin by Aubrey in multiple instances, as if she knew how bad this dialogue was. But hey, it's 85 year old Coppola, let him cook! Add to that that they put 'See it in IMAX' into the first trailers at a time IMAX hadn't even agreed to distribution yet, the fact that they MADE UP press quotes and put it in the trailer followed by many apologies by the production team, the fact Coppola says that he knows that the film will be a cult classic in 20 years. As bitter as it may sound, but it's time to leave the stage, old man. Because obviously even the once great geniuses of cinema can't save this artform from the predicament it is currently in.

The film felt like nothing more than a mere indulgence for a once great filmmaker who wanted to get one last taste of a 'big time movie' after having spend decades making obscure indie films that no one has seen - just like this one from the looks of the box office. It's a pseudo-intellectual, honestly childish and immaturely written, badly acted and even worse thought out insult at the legacy of a once great artist.
I expected that even if I didn't care for the story, acting, and so forth, at least visually it ought to be interesting to see on the big screen. Instead, I felt it was an ugly, tedious film to watch, which totally surprised me. I mean, once you've watched The Godfather, you'll never forget the look and feel of that world, regardless of whether you forget specific plot points or characters. But what happened with Megalopolis? I agree with you that the only fun to be had is the unintentional comedy.

I saw this on Friday night, and just to make it a really bizarre weekend, I went to The Wild Robot this afternoon. The contrast couldn't be more stark. Both films argue for seeking utopia, but the difference between what they each have to say about getting there... One film is a jumbled, crass mess with nothing interesting to say, and the other is a beautiful, poetic meditation that continues throughout the runtime to build more and more with something to aspire to in life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vega

It needs somewhere north of 60 opening weekends with ~$4M haul each, and it will be fine. Problem solved :naughty:

It's a vanity project, some of the wine in the world paid for it... Maybe folly rather than fable... In Vino Veritas rather than joints.
 
I might not have understood all the references and everything this masterpiece tries to say, but I liked enough to see it is a masterpiece, that will probably be appreciated by later generations, not this one too much embroiled in the current events this movie is pointing out. People don't like when things are too on the nose, when someone tells it to them like it is, reveals true things about themselves and our society. No wonder many (majority?) didn't like it - but that is precisely how you know it's a good movie.
The banker sponsored riots alone tell me Coppola is against all those Soros sponsored BLM riots.
The building developer is even shot in the face...
I mean, it couldn't be clearer, and that's why this, now former, corrupt establishment hated this film.
I love the ending, it's exactly what we need as a society and as a human race, a little hope of a brighter future without hate.

I might be wrong in my interpretation, but at least there's something interesting to unearth here, unlike in Lynch's artsy-fartsy fever dreams, that bear no meaning, and are a joke at the viewer's expense - with fans endlessly arguing over an empty space, like a banana duct taped to a wall...

P.S. Tarantino has said that Joker sequel is a big F U to the viewers and the studio - not sure about that, but this is definitely a big final FU from Coppola to the establishment, half the cast consisting of canceled by their mobs actors underlining that!
 
Last edited: