Se7en - 30th Anniversary (4K+2D Blu-ray SteelBook) [UK]

Flloydo

That's not a skirt girl, that's a sawn off shotgun
Premium Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
35,712
Ur mum
Release date: January 6, 2025
Purchase links: Amazon UK - Zavvi - HMV - Golden Discs
Price: £29.99 (Amazon - Zavvi - HMV) - €40.00 (Golden Discs)

81R6mLGEOAL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
71nBIEtnuEL._AC_SL1500_.jpg 71yn+ZGkuxL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
Dear Customers,

Thank you for your patience whilst we’ve developed our 4K restoration plans for David Fincher’s Seven. We’re pleased to announce that the restoration will finally be released in early 2025, with a brand-new 4K scan carefully overseen by Fincher.

We will be releasing two products: a Digipak and a Steelbook release, both developed and designed by the director himself. These products will replace the previously announced What’s in the Box and Ultimate Collector’s Edition versions.

Pre-order for the new products will go live in early November. Apologies again for the delay, and thank you for understanding. We can’t wait for you to experience Seven in more detail and depth than ever before."

Apologies for any inconvenience this cancellation might cause, and we genuinely appreciate your understanding.

Thanks again for your support, we’re excited to share this new release with you soon!

81ONt6i2snL._AC_SL1500_.jpg 81LPYorGJZL._AC_SL1500_.jpg

Collectors edition contents
  • Film on 4K UHD and Blu-Ray
  • Steelbook (Design TBC)
  • Slipcase (Design TBC)
  • John Doe 38-Page Booklet
  • 7x Deadly Sin Crime Scene Art Cards
  • Double-Sided A3 Poster
  • 'Help Me' Glow-in-the-Dark Art Card
  • Investigation Chalkboard Art Card

What’s in the box edition contents:
  • Film on 4K UHD and Blu-Ray
  • Steelbook (Design TBC)
  • Box Packaging (Design TBC)
  • John Doe 38-Page Booklet
  • Frosted Pine LITTLE TREES Brand Air Freshener
  • 7x Deadly Sin Comic Books
  • 7x Deadly Sin Crime Scene Art Cards
  • Double-Sided A3 Poster
  • “Help Me” Glow-in-the-Dark Art Card
  • Investigation Chalkboard Art Card
  • Numbered Sticker of Authenticity
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I open my own forum then I’ll get your IP address from Andy and block you before the site is live. The grand opening will celebrate the fact you can’t join. I’ll give everyone an Amazon gift certificate who recommends you to join from here just to troll you
Dude uncool. I thought we were cool now.
 
Oh yeah so I’m guessing there’s a few crime documentary fans here. There’s a new zodiac doc (3 part) all about Arthur Leigh Allen on Netflix and it’s well worth the watch. He’s always been the top of my suspect list and I’m guessing that’s why I enjoyed zodiac so much because Fincher also sways with Graysmith and his book. But this is from the perspective of the kids he grew up with in the 70s and them as adults now realising that he was the zodiac and also Robert Graysmith is interviewed heavily in it which he does not do normally. It’s incredible. If you were ever on the fence about Allen being the Zodiac killer you won’t be after this doc trust me. It all adds up

Also it’s amazing how much Fincher made his film scene for scene how Graysmith described it. He from what I could see only changed one thing and it’s the final scene in the film
 
Oh come on. That's hardly enough for any fun at all. Counter offer. 1 serious comment per day and 1 joke, with options open for at least several for unforeseen arguments.
Will other people be writing your jokes? If so it’s a deal
 
Don’t drink too much or you might go inside one of your cats!
You really should stop projecting your own fantasies onto others. It's not healthy. Neither is it healthy to act them out. Just keep that **** to your self and we will all be better for it.
 
Oh yeah so I’m guessing there’s a few crime documentary fans here. There’s a new zodiac doc (3 part) all about Arthur Leigh Allen on Netflix and it’s well worth the watch. He’s always been the top of my suspect list and I’m guessing that’s why I enjoyed zodiac so much because Fincher also sways with Graysmith and his book. But this is from the perspective of the kids he grew up with in the 70s and them as adults now realising that he was the zodiac and also Robert Graysmith is interviewed heavily in it which he does not do normally. It’s incredible. If you were ever on the fence about Allen being the Zodiac killer you won’t be after this doc trust me. It all adds up

Also it’s amazing how much Fincher made his film scene for scene how Graysmith described it. He from what I could see only changed one thing and it’s the final scene in the film
Got a notification for this today, straight on my list to watch over the weekend or next week. Hugely fascinating case for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flloydo
Hmm think I kinda recall the scene now. Still don't remember the exact shot used though, so can't be anything pivotal. Just seems like a very random choice for steel art... would be like using the close up shot of Bob's moob in Fight Club.

Fight Club Hug GIF
That'd actually still be more memorable and referential, than the crap they put on this steel, that no one remembers, associates, or can even discern properly. It's a total failure, and if Mr. Fincher chose it, I'm beginning to have major questions...
Unless 'they' showed him a couple of choices - that, and a black mockup with just the title, or something, and asked to pick one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Noodles
Oh yeah so I’m guessing there’s a few crime documentary fans here. There’s a new zodiac doc (3 part) all about Arthur Leigh Allen on Netflix and it’s well worth the watch. He’s always been the top of my suspect list and I’m guessing that’s why I enjoyed zodiac so much because Fincher also sways with Graysmith and his book. But this is from the perspective of the kids he grew up with in the 70s and them as adults now realising that he was the zodiac and also Robert Graysmith is interviewed heavily in it which he does not do normally. It’s incredible. If you were ever on the fence about Allen being the Zodiac killer you won’t be after this doc trust me. It all adds up

Also it’s amazing how much Fincher made his film scene for scene how Graysmith described it. He from what I could see only changed one thing and it’s the final scene in the film
Binged that the day it went up and it certainly made it difficult not to think Allen was the Zodiac. However, a lot of Netflix crime docs are pretty biased and loose on actual facts (sometimes even completely making stuff up) just to make for a more interesting/entertaining watch, and of course that particular doc was very one sided, so I try to remain open minded about them. There's even a guy on TikTok who kinda blew up not too long ago because he believes his deceased grandad was the killer and provided tons of "proof" to back it up. So just goes to show that anyone can tell a convincing story if they have a personal agenda and put the time in.
 
Binged that the day it went up and it certainly made it difficult not to think Allen was the Zodiac. However, a lot of Netflix crime docs are pretty biased and loose on actual facts (sometimes even completely making stuff up) just to make for a more interesting/entertaining watch,

I watch loads of Netflix docs and this isn’t really the case at all. They’re probably the best at them and have been for the past 6-8 years. Maybe one slips through that might be bias toward something but their docs are literally the best in the world for this kind of stuff
and of course that particular doc was very one sided, so I try to remain open minded about them.
This is one sided because it’s based on the kids that grew up around Allen and them coming to the realisation of their whole childhood linking up to the facts about when Allen was a major suspect and all the dates matching all the crimes and killings and it all connects to everything with him and Graysmiths book who based his book and findings on the one major suspect.. Allen.
And the film made them realise because finchers art of incredible detail and keeping it exactly like Graysmiths book which is based on factual evidence and findings which is absolutely fascinating

He was always 99% at the top of the list but they couldn’t get him on his hand writing so when Fincher made Zodiac he was also on Graysmiths side and based it all on his book and in the case there were hundreds of suspects for the zodiac (and as you say still are - the person you are referring to is possibly the man named Gary? That came up a couple of years ago) so Fincher even throws the curve ball in the film with the guy who’s writing on the posters was a match and he also had a basement but that’s the only 2 things that implied it could be that suspect which is genius because this is Graysmith and Fincher saying well it possibly isn’t Allen… but it 100% is because that’s how all the evidence they did have pointed toward. literally Allen had too many coincidences which is a fact that’s never right in crime. No one has that many coincidences and isn’t the actual suspect. It just don’t happen. And detectives and analysts will live by this
There's even a guy on TikTok who kinda blew up not too long ago because he believes his deceased grandad was the killer and provided tons of "proof" to back it up. So just goes to show that anyone can tell a convincing story if they have a personal agenda and put the time in.
But again you don’t have those kinds of coincidences. Literally tons of them. It was very clearly that man. They got it right in the 70s but just couldn’t get him. I mean the biggest thing is the Zodiac stopped killing when Allen was sent away for 4 years (which they also cover in the film) and then came back the second he came out. They just didn’t have enough physical evidence and eye witnesses to get him.. he was crafty. But what they did have pointed it him… 100% Allen. Thought it when I got into the zodiac killer before the film, defo after the film and still adamant 17 years after the film. Anyway anyone who’s a fan of the film or obsessed with the case will enjoy it because it opens up so much more and it’s really fascinating
 
Binged that the day it went up and it certainly made it difficult not to think Allen was the Zodiac. However, a lot of Netflix crime docs are pretty biased and loose on actual facts (sometimes even completely making stuff up) just to make for a more interesting/entertaining watch, and of course that particular doc was very one sided, so I try to remain open minded about them. There's even a guy on TikTok who kinda blew up not too long ago because he believes his deceased grandad was the killer and provided tons of "proof" to back it up. So just goes to show that anyone can tell a convincing story if they have a personal agenda and put the time in.
Still seems too much of a coincidence that Allen visited the site of many murders with the kids, taught ciphers in school when he was a teacher....and you know..., the killings stopped when he was locked up.

That mother in the documentary sure knew how to pick guys
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flloydo
I watch loads of Netflix docs and this isn’t really the case at all. They’re probably the best at them and have been for the past 6-8 years. Maybe one slips through that might be bias toward something but their docs are literally the best in the world for this kind of stuff

This is one sided because it’s based on the kids that grew up around Allen and them coming to the realisation of their whole childhood linking up to the facts about when Allen was a major suspect and all the dates matching all the crimes and killings and it all connects to everything with him and Graysmiths book who based his book and findings on the one major suspect.. Allen.
And the film made them realise because finchers art of incredible detail and keeping it exactly like Graysmiths book which is based on factual evidence and findings which is absolutely fascinating

He was always 99% at the top of the list but they couldn’t get him on his hand writing so when Fincher made Zodiac he was also on Graysmiths side and based it all on his book and in the case there were hundreds of suspects for the zodiac (and as you say still are - the person you are referring to is possibly the man named Gary? That came up a couple of years ago) so Fincher even throws the curve ball in the film with the guy who’s writing on the posters was a match and he also had a basement but that’s the only 2 things that implied it could be that suspect which is genius because this is Graysmith and Fincher saying well it possibly isn’t Allen… but it 100% is because that’s how all the evidence they did have pointed toward. literally Allen had too many coincidences which is a fact that’s never right in crime. No one has that many coincidences and isn’t the actual suspect. It just don’t happen. And detectives and analysts will live by this

But again you don’t have those kinds of coincidences. Literally tons of them. It was very clearly that man. They got it right in the 70s but just couldn’t get him. I mean the biggest thing is the Zodiac stopped killing when Allen was sent away for 4 years (which they also cover in the film) and then came back the second he came out. They just didn’t have enough physical evidence and eye witnesses to get him.. he was crafty. But what they did have pointed it him… 100% Allen. Thought it when I got into the zodiac killer before the film, defo after the film and still adamant 17 years after the film. Anyway anyone who’s a fan of the film or obsessed with the case will enjoy it because it opens up so much more and it’s really fascinating
Lol mate, it is. Do some research on them and you'll soon realise how they manipulate certain things to cater to their own story. There's been massive discussions/complaints about the way Netflix do their docs over the years... even very recently with the Menendez bros.

Exactly, it's one sided... that was my point, which you've proven. Again, look it all up and you'll soon find not everything they claimed is factually true. I was more or less convinced myself until I spent the rest of the night reading up about all these new claims.

But yeah, not saying it definitely wasn't him. There's a good chance it was! But until there's hard and clear evidence from officials, I'm staying open minded... innocent until proven guilty and all that jazz.

There's no way you can say it's 100% him though... he would've been charged by now if that were the case lol. 99%, sure. But 100% based on "coincidences" rather than straight facts or clear evidence....nah.

I love the film, but it's just that, a film, based on a book. Both of which rely on making sales of course, so they're gonna exaggerate things to some extent for entertainment (and :greedy:) purposes.

I'm probably just being stubborn for the sake of not wanting to appear gullible anyway, and a personal experience years ago taught me not to judge so quickly or believe everything I hear/read.

All that said, it's an enjoyable watch whether you believe it or not, so Netflix win again! :p