yeah, i guess your right.But here, we are not judging the artwork. The thing that FA worked on is not the art, but the item itself: the Steelbook. The Steelbook design was made by Filmarena, it's their team who chose the art, worked on the bossing, chose the finish etc. It's probably Filmarena who dealt with Scanavo, Studiocanal probably not doing anything else than approving the use of the posters/images for the front, back and inside. Yes the art is a property of Studiocanal, but the final result (the Steelbook) isn't. And I think that's what causing issues here. But again, it really depends what was written on the contract.
But here, we are not judging the artwork. The thing that FA worked on is not the art, but the item itself: the Steelbook. The Steelbook design was made by Filmarena, it's their team who chose the art, worked on the bossing, chose the finish etc. It's probably Filmarena who dealt with Scanavo, Studiocanal probably not doing anything else than approving the use of the posters/images for the front, back and inside. Yes the art is a property of Studiocanal, but the final result (the Steelbook) isn't. And I think that's what causing issues here. But again, it really depends what was written on the contract.
Do we know at this point if the contract is GITD?
So what everybody seems to be saying is that it really depends on what's in the contract. That's like a sentence that contains the word"but". Nothing that comes before the word "but" matters.
Just like nothing that comes before "it depends on what's in the contract" matters.
"Congratulations Johnny! You just won a million dollars in our contest! But sadly it says in our contract that if we decided that we don't want to pay out we don't have to."
not that easy I believe. Yes the studio owns the rights of movie, but it's FA employees who worked on the design. So depending what was written in the contract, the studio might not have the right to use something that was made by a 3rd party.
Look at the John Wick 3 Steelbook (France and Benelux front artwork), the poster was made by a 3rd party artist (who actually used images from John Wick 2) and the studio paid the artist to use these as official posters, if I am correct.
I'm not saying FA are the good guys here, it really depends what was written in the contract when FA asked to make a Terminator 2 release.
Not seeing the relevance as they are not identical.
the artwork here is arnie on the motorcycle.. not the placement of the title or any other minor tweaks!
otherwise my new idea of creating WEA would be: take existing WEA and realign it 1mm to the left.. voila, totally new.. dare to use it, i sue the **** out of you ;-)
yes, but how much work is behind choosing a finish, adding that gitg effect, etc? i guess the studio could do all that by themselves in 15 minutes... so they probably thought that fac wouldnt mind if they reuse their concept... im worried that if fac insist on this, the studio will be reluctent to work with them in the future... if they even care enough..Yeah, seriously, it's not the same at all. Different finish, embossing, no GITD, and I do count the title placement as part of the design. That didn't design itself on its own.
FA either have a contract in place or they don't. And maybe someone is in breach... or maybe not.
I doubt FA think they invented the original art they have worked on.
UK and Germany is not 3 Discs and was not listed at any stage on their website as 3 discsSomething seems to be happening with this release.
This is my original pre-order confirmation from amazon.de (the price was 35,53 €):
View attachment 445910
Now it's not showing "3-Disc steelbook" anymore. And the price is now down to 27,53 €.
View attachment 445911
So maybe some copyright problem after all?