Nintendo Wii U Confirmed!

mobius387

beer snob
Premium Supporter
Feb 16, 2009
4,404
Milwaukee, WI
Wii U

11x06071813.jpg


wii-u-controller-press-1307466616.jpg

Coming in 2012, Nintendo's next home console will deliver "deeper game experiences" that aim to offer "something for everyone." And it'll be called the Wii U! A variety of new controls will be made available by that crazy new controller with a 6.2-inch touchscreen embedded in it. Most importantly, you'll no longer be tied to a TV to enjoy your home consoling action -- the Wii U controller can handle your gaming session when the television is needed for other purposes, while a built-in front-facing cam will let you video chat from anywhere too. Notably, you won't have to use the 6.2-inch behemoth if you don't want too -- the Wii U will be compatible with all current-gen accessories and software. Yes, your expansive Wii collection will play on the U version of the console as well. We've also seen some decidedly high-def visuals from Nintendo showing off the Wii U's graphical prowess.

E3 launch video

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not sure about this either. It seems like they're going for a controller gimmick rather than a great machine. Given that the Japanese are HUGE supporters of portable gaming I'd expect this do to well in JPN.

If the Controller was 3G enabled, or in the very least able to do a "remote play" feature if you're on wifi while away I could see it being a much better option and a huge success... But if it's just something that's going to be used around the house i'm not sure.

I don't think many people can justify buying a new console at this point...
 
So I was reading that the Wii U controller will NOT be available for purchase. Each system will come bundled with ONE controller and that's all you can use with the system. Other users will still need to use a Wii controller.

No word yet on what you do if yours breaks and you need a replacement.
 
Wow. That's lame.

Here we go... :)

Does Nintendo's Wii U only support 1 touchscreen controller?

wii-u-controller-650x309.jpg

Though the masses don’t seem to have picked up on this yet, one of the first things we noticed when Nintendo unveiled the Wii U this morning was that, though it showed plenty of multiplayer game concepts for the new console, none of them involved more than one Wii U controller at a time. We can confirm that the console definitely supports a Wii U controller and up to 4 more Wii Remotes, but we are becoming fairly certain that Nintendo is not currently planning to support more than one Wii U touchscreen controller on its upcoming system.

Below are a few reasons why we think Wii U only supports one touchscreen controller (at this time).

Nintendo’s press release talks of “a” controller: The official press release for the Wii U is titled “Nintendo’s upcoming Wii U console features a controller with 6.2-inch screen.” The press release also speaks of “a” new controller, but never mentions more than one.

No Wii U demos use multiple controllers: As far as we can tell, none of Nintendo’s proof-of-concept demos utilize more than one Wii U controller at the same time. Nintendo’s mock-up Wii U living room shows only one of the touch controllers.

Representatives refuse to comment: I went through a litany of Nintendo booth attendants, representatives, and other personnel asking whether the Wii U would support more than one controller and none of them would comment on the subject, at all. In the end, I was told that this is not something Nintendo is prepared to reveal at this time.

This controller is expensive: Just looking at the 6.2-inch touchscreen on the controller is enough to know that the Wii U controller will likely be the most expensive default controller ever released for a home console. If it were to retail as an accessory, we expect it would be priced far higher than the $40-$50 price tag of current generation controllers. Possibly a great deal higher, like $100-$200 or more.

Omission is often admission: Nintendo is a quiet company, but when it revealed the Wii, it was very open about the console’s 4 player capabilities. Today, it readily showed us that the Wii U can pair up with four Wii Remotes, but it very deliberately has never shown more than one Wii U touchscreen controller at a time.

If true, this is sad news for gamers

Nintendo is pushing the Wii U as a console that is as equally suited to hardcore games as it is casual games. In its press conference Nintendo executives repeated this fact and even had EA’s CEO come out and pledge hardcore game support. But how can Nintendo say it is fully supporting hardcore games if its new console only supports one hardcore game controller at a time? Last weekend, I played through Portal 2‘s splitscreen multiplayer co-operative mode. This would be impossible on the Wii U. While it’s likely that Nintendo will beef up its online gameplay (it will need to now), only supporting a single touch screen controller greatly limits the gameplay possibilities of the system for hardcore games.

Of course, multiplayer games could still use the familiar nunchucks, but that would rob the Wii U of what is easily its best and most innovative feature.

Casual gamers should also be disappointed. Many of the game concepts Nintendo showed off today, including augmented reality, using the Wii U controller as a gun sight, etc, will only be possible as single player experiences. Multiplayer modes will have to be limited to concepts where players pass the good controller from person to person, taking turns.

Remember Legend of Zelda: Four Swords Adventures? At E3 2003, Nintendo unveiled several games for its GameCube console that let players use their Game Boy Advances as controllers. This concept never took off for various reasons, but it spawned several fun games like FSA, which let players hold inventories and actually play on their handheld screens. There are a number of great game concepts that could arise from having more than a single touchscreen controller. It’s a shame to think we may never see them.

Whether it has to do with screen streaming limitations, the power of the console itself, or the cost of these touchscreen controllers, Nintendo doesn’t seem to want us to have more than one. Hopefully they change their collective minds.
 
"Nintendo Looking into Games that Support Two New Controllers"

Nintendo's Wii U controller is such an extraordinary device that we've been hearing some skepticism from readers that the company would expect gamers to have more than one of them. After all, the thing looks expensive. It's got a screen, and a mic, and a camera, and lots of buttons.

Is Nintendo going to expect people to have four of these things for local multiplayer games?

Katsuya Eguchi, who is working on a five-player Wii U prototype here, doesn't make it sound like that'll be a requirement. In fact, it may not even happen at all.

"We're considering our options with maybe two screens," Eguchi told Kotaku, who said he considers multiple New Controller games to be "an interesting idea." That would mean games that used two new Wii U controllers. Eguchi's five-player prototype, here at E3, has one person using a new controller and four other people using Wii Remote-Nunchuck combos.

While Eguchi didn't explain why Nintendo isn't looking into four-new-controller gaming, it's possible that the Wii U couldn't output to four screens at once (plus a TV). It's also simply possible that Nintendo would find that configuration too pricey for its customers. Nintendo hasn't said what the new controller will cost. But Eguchi answered my question about whether gamers should be concerned about the controller's price by saying that "I do understand that if the price is too high that would be an obstacle."

source
 
Last edited by a moderator:
unless it costs $150 per controller

You are going to be a filthy rich doctor, $150 might equate to me carrying 1 few dollars in my pocket ;) it shouldn't bother you then right? :p

"Nintendo Looking into Games that Support Two New Controllers"

Nintendo's Wii U controller is such an extraordinary device that we've been hearing some skepticism from readers that the company would expect gamers to have more than one of them. After all, the thing looks expensive. It's got a screen, and a mic, and a camera, and lots of buttons.

Is Nintendo going to expect people to have four of these things for local multiplayer games?

Katsuya Eguchi, who is working on a five-player Wii U prototype here, doesn't make it sound like that'll be a requirement. In fact, it may not even happen at all.

"We're considering our options with maybe two screens," Eguchi told Kotaku, who said he considers multiple New Controller games to be "an interesting idea." That would mean games that used two new Wii U controllers. Eguchi's five-player prototype, here at E3, has one person using a new controller and four other people using Wii Remote-Nunchuck combos.

While Eguchi didn't explain why Nintendo isn't looking into four-new-controller gaming, it's possible that the Wii U couldn't output to four screens at once (plus a TV). It's also simply possible that Nintendo would find that configuration too pricey for its customers. Nintendo hasn't said what the new controller will cost. But Eguchi answered my question about whether gamers should be concerned about the controller's price by saying that "I do understand that if the price is too high that would be an obstacle."

source

This could be the reason why their stock is dropping as the days pass by.
 
Nintendo says one Wii U controller per console

Nintendo's tablet-esque Wii U controller raised a few questions when it was announced at E3. Questions like, "What kind of crazy games are going to use that thing," and "How much will a second controller cost me?" The latter, at least, has been answered. Nothing. You don't need one. Nintendo's Satoru Iwata recently said in an interview that games enlisting more than one Wii U controller aren't being considered just yet -- although they are possible. Our very own Ittousai tells us that Iwata told Diamond Online that the Wii U can technically support multiple screen-controllers, but that additional slabs would be too expensive to sell on their own. Iwata went on to say that the console would ship with only one, and that game developers should design titles under the assumption that each console will use a single Wii U controller. Player two will have to settle for a good 'ol Wiimote.
 
Wii U will not play DVDs or Blu-ray, Iwata says

Planning to replace that aging Blu-ray player with a Wii U? Not so fast. Nintendo president Satoru Iwata says the gaming console won't play DVD or Blu-ray discs, due to patent licensing fees.

"Wii U does not have DVD or Blu-ray playback capabilities. The reason for that is that we feel that enough people already have devices that are capable of playing DVDs and Blu-ray, such that it didn't warrant the cost involved to build that functionality into the Wii U console because of the patents related to those technologies."
 
Nintendo might have shown the Wii U off at this year's E3, but that doesn't mean the console is gearing up towards a launch in early 2012.

All we know for now is Nintendo plans to release the Wii U sometime after April 1, 2012. With declining Wii and DS sales and the lacklustre performance of the 3DS to date, most had assumed that would mean the Wii U would be out not long after April 1.

But Nintendo boss Satoru Iwata has since said "Since the Wii U we showed you at the E3 show in June was still in the development phase without very specific proposals on the software titles, we are going to announce the release date and the price next year when we are able to explain the specific proposals."

If Nintendo isn't even announcing dates and prices until 2012, it certainly seems a Spring launch would be pushing it; maybe we should all expect a Summer release instead. Give all that software that's "without very specific proposals" time to turn into "video games we enjoy playing".

Source: Kotaku

They are shooting themselves on the foot. By keeping the price hidden and not announcing it now people are going to react in a more negative way when they announced close to release. If they were to say it now, people will have time to think about the price until release date.