Last edited by a moderator:
"new and fresh"
Yeah, ready to get rid of a companion piece inspired by that steel right now,,
What planet are you on? Retailers are in business to make money. You're acting as if retailers don't sell millions of ****** products everyday. There's always someone who will buy bad movies, ugly clothing or terrible food.
If for some reason Zavvi turned them down Amazon (or someone else) would absolutely pick them up. In fact many of the last wave of Fox's popart steelbooks were trade wide.
These are a fox release the previous fox pop art steelbooks in 2014 was trade wide in the UK the only difference is this new batch of fox steelbooks will be Zavvi exclusives in the UKThe fact is that someone at Zavvi is very bad at their job. Yeah of course their only real goal is to make money, but how is choosing to distribute another wave of garbage steelbooks in any way a good business decision? They'll all end up at £4.99 when they realise only a handful of people bought them. At best they'll break even with most of these, so I ask again - why not tell the studio to go back and do a better job.
You don't know that, it's pure speculation. And, once again, if there's no money to be made on these steelbooks then the smart decision would be to let Amazon (or whoever) make a probable loss on an inferior product.
The fact is that someone at Zavvi is very bad at their job. Yeah of course their only real goal is to make money, but how is choosing to distribute another wave of garbage steelbooks in any way a good business decision? They'll all end up at £4.99 when they realise only a handful of people bought them. At best they'll break even with most of these, so I ask again - why not tell the studio to go back and do a better job.
You don't know that, it's pure speculation. And, once again, if there's no money to be made on these steelbooks then the smart decision would be to let Amazon (or whoever) make a probable loss on an inferior product.
kinda proving you're talking utter nonsense
That's a very far fetched reference, and completely wrong.
As the type of eyes don't match. And the use of the spiral to mean hypnotizing has been around for decades.
If you asked any random person to draw something related to hypnosis they'd draw a swirly thing.
Incoming an edit with examples of spirals
Not really. No. As well as it needs to be. True. Most likely.
Random is my middle name.
Sorry you don't like The Marx Brothers or DUCK SOUP (1933)
Anyway, You're not wrong about hypnotic spirals - been around for hundreds if not thousands of years - in China, for example - and popularised in 'modern times' by folk such as Mesmer (1724 - 1815) and de Puysegur (1751 - 1825) . . but let's not forget that that was a machine with rotating spiral disc attached and not eyes like here on the FMr.F steelbook and in "Duck Soup".
As for me, when I think of spirals I think of my Vangelis LP:-