Last edited by a moderator:
yeah really bad steelbook,,,,i hope the trilogy one is better..........
I seriously cannot fathom why a studio would release a successful big budget blockbuster movie without the mention of its name anywhere on the actual product... is there even a logical/financial reason to it, or are they genuinely just that ignorant when it comes to steelbooks?
P.S. The note about there being a title on the spine has now been removed from the OP due to the source not being as reliable as we first assumed.
That doesn't surprise me to be honest... but how much money can it really be saving them? At the end of the day they'll be losing sales due to it, because the steelbook now looks trash.It's a cost saving exercise, pure and simple. What a way to reward fans that are already paying extra for the privilege of owning the steelbook version
P.S. The note about there being a title on the spine has now been removed from the OP due to the source not being as reliable as we first assumed.
Thanks for confirming.Someone on reddit just posted a pic of the HMV steel and it does not have the title on the spine
As is this steelbook.Steelbook.com and HMV twitter feeds are a load of bollocks.
I seriously cannot fathom why a studio would release a successful big budget blockbuster movie without the mention of its name anywhere on the actual product... is there even a logical/financial reason to it, or are they genuinely just that ignorant when it comes to steelbooks?
You're probably right, but it's a pretty ridiculous reason if true... all that money they make, and they're being tight about spending some extra change on the spine title.I think the reason is: the different languages. They won't bother making multiple Steelbooks. Only Warner seems to be doing that these days.
You're probably right, but it's a pretty ridiculous reason if true... all that money they make, and they're being tight about spending some extra change on the spine title.