Thor: Ragnarok (4K and 3D Blu-ray SteelBooks) (Zavvi Exclusive) [UK]

[luke98]

Release date: February 26, 2018
Purchase links: 4K - 3D
Price: £32.99 (4K) - £24.99 (3D)

Spoiler

 

[Strangerbyday]

Love it, looks great!

 

[Butz2k]

Gloss finish, title on spine and no stupid novelty artwork (like Ant-Man and GOTG etc.)... Works for me!

 

[Spinky]

Hulk on the back would make it perfect, but even without it the choice of art is better than all of their standard Marvel steels recently.

 

[RickB84]

Sucks I have to choose between 4K and 3D. Why can’t I have both, if I have 4K I don’t need the Blu Ray. Or better, just a 4K 3D disc

 

[St4rlord]

I think this will be pretty impressive in hand with a gloss finish. It makes sense to only have Thor on the front of the non-premiums because it gives the premiums oppprtunity for variety i.e. @Noodles concept art!
If you collect both then hey presto, you have variety! The last thing I want is to have the same image on this as the front of a premium release. None of us really expect wonders from WWA/zavvi and equivalent but what they do provide is a diverse opportunity to capitalise upon by our overseas retailers. Even those who have WWA steelbooks, you know the slips aren't going to be the same.

I really like this release and I think it will show vibrance.

 

[Noodles]

Not great, but not terrible either... they're certainly improving with each steelbook release, so by 2030 we should hopefully be seeing stunning WWA Marvel steels once again.

 

[Lotrek]

Would of preferred Hulk on the back...may wait and hold out on what the eventual lenti edition from zavvi looks like.

 

[virkia]

Eenie, meenie . . . continuing the theme of spine title vs. spine thumbnail pics . . .

Single image on the front = Good . . . multiple images on the front = Bad.

Anyway, liking the simplicity and colours across the covers and feel it'll be a worthy addition to any Thor steelbook collection:-

Spoiler

Good . . .

Same artwork pimped by Blufans . . .

Bad . . .

 

[Flloydo]

I personally think hulk should be on the back but I do really like it for a wwa version.

And then blufans will use awesome poster art so I’ll be happy with getting both

 

[Basil]

I personally think hulk should be on the back but I do really like it for a wwa version.

And then blufans will use awesome poster art so I’ll be happy with getting both

have blufans confirmed for this year then?

basil

 

[Flloydo]

have blufans confirmed for this year then?

basil

Do they need to? Lol

 

[dragon762mm]

Found this fan made design today.much better than zavvis.

 

[tommyh84]

Found this fan made design today.much better than zavvis.

Very nice that, think @Noodles design just edges it though

Thor: Ragnarok (2017)

View attachment 343975

 

[virkia]

As happy with the red single figure artwork on the front of this steelbook as I'd have been with the green . . . anyhoo, both splendid

 

[lgans316]

Will buy the 3D version first and the 4K later as the former should feature IMAX scenes.

 

[Konflick]

i like the 4K plastic case cover because you can see all the characters in front cover

 

[Robsonmonkey]

When the normal blu ray/4k cover art is better...

That's Steelbook worthy...I hope Blu fans do it.

 

[thewoe]

I like the Steel cover better, the 4K cover looks way too Guardians of the galaxy.

 

[Spinky]

I'll take this over the steel and 4K amaray art, honestly.

Still think the steel is fine, though.

 

[St4rlord]

When the normal blu ray/4k cover art is better...

That's Steelbook worthy...I hope Blu fans do it.

Nah, @Noodles concept is still the best for Blufans steelbook imo. The above would make a nice full slip cover though.