That's fair. And that's your taste in art.
I just think that if you have two mediums for the genre- you should do two different things with them.
Not to mention, many of the examples that you provided already have steelbooks with said designs:
The BluRay of Baby Driver has the same artwork on the UK Steelbook release.
The Filmarena Collection Edition of Logan is by far the superior example to the International Steelbook.
That being said- I can use the same mode of examples the other way around.
Look at the Amaray release for Daredevil Series 1 as opposed to the Zavvi Steelbook with artwork by Joe Quesada.
The Amaray releases of The Walking Dead as opposed to Entertainment Stores Steelbooks designed by Jock.
The Standard releases of Doctor Who Series 9 and 10 or Sherlock series 4 as opposed to the Steelbook rendered by Alice X. Zhang.
The Amaray of The Mist as opposed to Zavvi's Popart Steelbook.
The overabundance of promotional artwork portrays a very sterile look at film marketing that creates and propagates trends within the industry.
Propagating the same use of promotional material creates a homogeny within the industry that creates prevailing trends that make a lot of movie posters look the same, whereas having artists create their own interpretation of the inherent value they see in the film.
That's not to say that the steelbook is always superior to the amaray, heavens no- of course not. But it is circumstantial.
MY MAIN ARGUMENT is that the Amaray release and the Steelbook release shouldn't use the same artwork. It SHOULD be different- it should utilize the idea that the steelbook is a canvas meant for artists to express their creativity based on what has inspired them from the film in question. The most egregious and upsetting Steelbook releases (in my opinion) aren't the ones with horrible artwork (the Amazon.de Predator Steelbook comes to mind), but rather the Steelbooks like the Bluefans Force Awakens or the NovaMedia John Wick- where the artwork is the same as the amaray.
I hope this clears things up.