Last edited:
Hope the film is not as bad as the rotten tomatoes reviews![]()

Seeing as RT is an aggregate review site by "reviewers" who are "self-appointed" reviewers with No Credentials - their reviews mean f**k all to me. Start a YouTube channel and, you too, can be a RT certified reviewer.Hope the film is not as bad as the rotten tomatoes reviews![]()
What are you even rambling on about? No, they're not. You use the word "aggregate" yet apparently you don't have a clue what it means.Seeing as RT is an aggregate review site by "reviewers" who are "self-appointed" reviewers with No Credentials...
Seeing as RT is an aggregate review site by "reviewers" who are "self-appointed" reviewers with No Credentials - their reviews mean f**k all to me. Start a YouTube channel and, you too, can be a RT certified reviewer.
Judge for yourself.
Any questions?What are you even rambling on about? No, they're not. You use the word "aggregate" yet apparently you don't have a clue what it means.
What are you even rambling on about? No, they're not. You use the word "aggregate" yet apparently you don't have a clue what it means.
Again, I talk about the definition of the word; which apparently continues to elude you.Any questions?
RT was started by Senh Duong, Patrick Y. Lee and Stephen Wang. They were web designers. Not film critics or film scholars.Again, I talk about the definition of the word; which apparently continues to elude you.
Read your earlier post again and you'll notice that you're implying that
one needs to be a professional reviewer in order to start a reliable, professional site that aggregates film reviews.
Or any other aggregator site for that matter.
One does not.
RT was started by Senh Duong, Patrick Y. Lee and Stephen Wang. They were web designers. Not film critics or film scholars.
The original point was: the site is an aggregator of reviews of people (the reviewers) whose opinions should in no way influence someone's views on film before seeing it.Which is why they created a web site...they don't review the films themselves... ... ...
I feel like I'm getting dumber reading these posts.
The original point was: the site is an aggregator of reviews of people (the reviewers) whose opinions should in no way influence someone's views on film before seeing it.
Not a hard idea to grasp.
Your first post is wrong and contains bad information. But I will agree with you for the sake of ending this argument. Good day.
Just saw the movie a few hours ago. Fantastic flick! Looking forward to the steel design.![]()