Lawless (Blu-ray SteelBook) (Play.com Exclusive) (Debossed) [UK]

[Wreck]

Lawless Play.com Exclusive
Release Date: January 14th, 2013
Buy Link: Lawless - £14.99 retail
Notes: 4k unit run, De-bossed bullet marks on front and back covers
Group Buy: For USA and Canada members only

View attachment 22769

View attachment 22770

Other pictures (inside)

Spoiler

and from Wreck (via play.com)

- ALL bullet holes front and back would be De-bossed.

- Any part of metal (guns) will be the actual metal tin showing through.

- The finish will be a gloss varnish

Official Hi-Def Ninja Video

[media=youtube]bxmLfQ0X1SI[/media]&feature=youtu.be

 

[hayemaker]

People are pretty fickle, cancelling because they've slightly changed the cover. What about the film, was anyone interested in that?

 

[nobby999]

People are pretty fickle, cancelling because they've slightly changed the cover. What about the film, was anyone interested in that?

I agree, people ready to lead a revolt against a Play because they have added what is quite frankly a gorgeous bird to the cover art

 

[vonnie]

this new addition makes me think it's more of an intrusion rather than an addition.
cartman explains it best:

"When you're trying to have intercourse with a lady friend, and some other guy comes up and tickles your balls from behind"

 

[bigfub]

I prefer the art that was originally shown but will still be buying the film for its own value

 

[Man of Steel]

Why the hell have they changed the cover? It was miles better before... Now it's ****!

Come on Wreck, work your magic buddy lol

 

[Bobthesub]

For me the original artwork looked better, but Ive still preordered it as Ive not had the chance to see it at the cinema, and for the price its about the same as Id pay for a trip to see it at the cinema so why not...

 

[Sigill]

I think I preferred the old artwork, this looks a little cramped now. Still going to pick this up though, the film looks good.

 

[CaptainCoffee]

Why did they change it? I mean I'd understand if they put the third brother in there but no, they put the chick in. This film was ALL about the Bondurant brothers.

It makes no sense at all. Can anybody find out why they changed the art? If they add anybody surely it should be Howard.

 

[Scarface]

don't think it makes much of a difference anyway still looks decent didn't think it looked amazing before either, i'm getting because i want to watch the movie not because of how many characters are on the front

 

[thedonguillermo79]

What in the world compelled them to change the cover art??? Man I'm glad I didn't join a group buy for this. Now I have to think if I really want it with this new art:movie:

 

[Jason Bourne]

gotta' agree with every one else.... the previous cover was miles better. Wreck if you can work your magic to have this changed back to how it was man that would be just awesome.

getting this either way though...

 

[Lukesablade]

They should have put the other brother on if anything,also get rid of the guns.I dont remember either actor using them.

 

[SimonLDT]

People are pretty fickle, cancelling because they've slightly changed the cover. What about the film, was anyone interested in that?

The whole point of a steelbook is for the art. For those that want just the film, the amaray will suffice.

This new cover looks hideous. Somebody obviously got an ego problem here, hence the addition.

Any chance this can be reverted back?

 

[Noodles]

*FACEPALM*

 

[DK06CTR]

Any chance you can inform them wreck that they have made a bad decision!

 

[Ricker]

I actually like the new cover, at least they put a real actor in front this time. Hardy rocks

 

[snooloui]

I prefer the original mock-up too. Even if only because it filled the space available better.

 

[SteelbookedUp]

Original mock up for me as well.

Wreck, can you tell Play that Ninjas are disgruntled and protest march is in the process of being organised.

We want our original back. :sniper:

 

[amen]

If anyone can...Wreck can!

 

[gbdragon]

Original art please Wreck...