Mission Impossible - The Ultimate Collection (Blu-ray SteelBook) (Zavvi Exclusive) [UK]

paulboland

Contributor Steels/Arrow
Contributor
Premium Supporter
Sep 10, 2012
42,953
Navan/Ireland
Release date: December 7, 2015
Purchase link: Zavvi
Price: £39.99
Notes: Limited to 2000 copies. Not a Jumbo, and no Mission Impossible on the spine

11162582-1014351344360531.JPG

image.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nice release but poor decision to have no title on the spine, don't they understand collectors put their steelbooks on the side too for display? they don't seem to care, no excuse with the amount spent by steelbook collectors.

I guess some collectors will add a custom spine title, I'm kind of put off, so not going to be getting this one for now, mauybe if the price drops, even then got to think about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluSteel2012
"THE ULTIMATE COLLECTION" of what ?
Could be anything (n)
Not a happy bunny and it's not like a Disney WWA or something like that . . .
 
Crying shame.

Nice design. Love the boss.

Shame it's going to get sent back for a full refund. Product supplied does not match the product image on the product page.

Some numbskull forgot to put the franchise title on the spine, and worse than that, some other numbskulls decided that it was acceptable to sell an error-marred product at full, premium price.

Yesterday was not my birthday.

Your loss Zavvi. I was already pushing the limit of accepting a £40 price point for this, but you just helped my decision to not bother with the MI's in steel book at all, and to make up my amaray box set with an amaray Rogue Nation (£12.50 in the 2 for £25 at Sainsburys, with an exclusive bonus second disk).

If they don't feel obliged to make consistently good products, I don't feel obliged to pay large money for their after-thoughts.
 
Cant beleive it doesnt say Mission Impossible on the spine. Its like they forgot to put it on............ Theres even a space for it to the left of Ultimate Collection.

As someone said, 'the ultimate collection' is written low leaving space for Mission: Impossible to fit above it.

Maybe there was no red ink left in the machine at the printers.

Agreed. It certainly looks like the "Mission Impossible" wording has been left off in error. I wonder if there is any way of finding out (and getting a reprint done to correct it, with replacements for all those already sent out)?
 
Crying shame.

Nice design. Love the boss.

Shame it's going to get sent back for a full refund. Product supplied does not match the product image on the product page.

Some numbskull forgot to put the franchise title on the spine, and worse than that, some other numbskulls decided that it was acceptable to sell an error-marred product at full, premium price.

Yesterday was not my birthday.

Your loss Zavvi. I was already pushing the limit of accepting a £40 price point for this, but you just helped my decision to not bother with the MI's in steel book at all, and to make up my amaray box set with an amaray Rogue Nation (£12.50 in the 2 for £25 at Sainsburys, with an exclusive bonus second disk).

If they don't feel obliged to make consistently good products, I don't feel obliged to pay large money for their after-thoughts.
This Steelbook is from Paramount
Same Steelbook in Asia and Europe and they are the exact same only the Jcard is different and the spine is the same also

Zavvi don't make any products never have done even the Zbox is made by another company all Zavvi do is pick what goes into it and these again are other companies products they are a retailer who sell other companies products with some products offered to them as a UK exclusive

Zavvi are the same as your high street record/video shops and online shops
HMV and Amazon are a retailer as is Zavvi and Sainsbury's

Sainsbury's did not make their exclusive mission impossible release either paramount UK got it made and offered as a exclusive to Sainsbury

Yes the spine is not the best but it's paramount error not Zavvi error
The other retailers in Europe and Asia have the same problem the spine missing mission impossible

Hard to tell if it's a mistake or was on purpose only paramount can answer that
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: goufcustom
It's strange that the mockups show the wording, it must be an error because the Ultimate Collection is in an odd place.

I wonder if there would be anyone from Paramount or the manufacturer who could be contacted about it.
 
I'll never know how these things get through quality control.

Blemishes, streaks, individual issues sure. You're dealing with thousands of the same product and are never going to notice everything, but a gap where the title should be? Why did no one at Paramount pick this up and get it sorted? Same with LionsGate and Mockingjay Part 1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luke98
This Steelbook is from Paramount
Same Steelbook in Asia and Europe and they are the exact same only the Jcard is different and the spine is the same also

Zavvi don't make any products never have done even the Zbox is made by another company all Zavvi do is pick what goes into it and these again are other companies products they are a retailer who sell other companies products with some products offered to them as a UK exclusive

Zavvi are the same as your high street record/video shops and online shops
HMV and Amazon are a retailer as is Zavvi and Sainsbury's

Sainsbury's did not make their exclusive mission impossible release either paramount UK got it made and offered as a exclusive to Sainsbury

Yes the spine is not the best but it's paramount error not Zavvi error
The other retailers in Europe and Asia have the same problem the spine missing mission impossible

Hard to tell if it's a mistake or was on purpose only paramount can answer that

As a former trade retailer I didn't need the lesson in the process.

Honestly, I'm not bothered whether it's Paramount's mistake, the schemes of Dick Dastardly or an act of God. Zavvi advertised and pre-sold a product. If the product was not right, it was their job to send it back to whoever supplied it to them, and so on up the chain. To take my money - or anyone else's - for visibly erroneous products was not their right, it was a privilege I granted them in exchange for product supplied at distance as per their visual representation and description.

Now, they can indeed pull the 'design may differ from that shown in preliminary artists impressions' card, but it wouldn't wash in practice because this is a premium product marketed exclusively on its aesthetic distinctiveness from standard product.

My issue is quite simply that regardless of whoever MADE the product and whoever made the error, it was a fundamental failure for Zavvi not to QA the stock prior to shipment, which has resulted in a financial liability of cost to themselves and to purchasers of this item in order to either make this issue good, or to grant due refund.

If all European retailers have this problem, then Paramount have a huge eff up on their hands, because this is now not a 'premium' product and even a future reissue, with unwanted 'flawed' product on the market, will not be able to be sold at a premium price. Very few movie fans other than serious 'collectors' will dream of dropping £40 for one of these with or without the glaring mistake on the spine, so the only foreseeable outlet for these is indeed as 'bargain basement' stock. And in the 6-12 weeks it will inevitably take Paramount to get around to a reissue or a full recall for a cosmetic repair, that's exactly where these items will belong, having lost the 'day one' excitement of a new released title (Rogue Nation).

This is the effective vindication of anyone who balked at the astronomically high price of purchasing this set.

I now utterly regret not listening to my initial hesitancy in justifying this collection's price point, and have advised Zavvi that I insist that they bear the cost of the return of the goods which have been supplied not as advertised and of a clearly defective, unfinished nature.

The rest is between them and Paramount or Technicolor or whoever is responsible these days, and of no concern to me.

I'm similarly abundantly aware that Sainsbury's don't make BluRay packages. They remain, however, entirely accountable for the 'exclusives' that they obtain and sell to the consumer. If these exclusives are going to be crap, shoddy packages, they'll stop paying premiums or striking volume deals for 'exclusives' because that term will begin to carry a negative connotation to their customers. The very nature of 'exclusive' denotes 'advantage' or 'premium' or 'more valuable.'

I've yet to come across a 'high street shop' that deals in specialist products which does not excitedly receive the new stock and have a least a handful of employees who want to enthusiastically examine the new items or enjoy the 'treat' of being the first to receive a personal reserved item at 'staff discount.' Someone at Zavvi looked at this. Someone recognised a problem. Someone said 'eff it' and shipped them out the door anyway. Guaranteed. Call it reckless abandon or calculated risk or any other business strategy you like. It was a decision that was fundamentally contrary to the spirit of consumer rights and distance selling.
 
It's strange that the mockups show the wording, it must be an error because the Ultimate Collection is in an odd place.

I wonder if there would be anyone from Paramount or the manufacturer who could be contacted about it.

Absolutely correct. It is right-shifted, off-centre and thus cannot be passed off as anything but a mistake. If intentionality were claimed, it would have to be justified on the basis that it would seem that 99% of that distributor's other titles conform to either the central alignment of the spine or shift-left as is common in the packaging of products which are stored, displayed and accessed in a 'book' style library fashion. If this is 'intentional' it represents a controversial new paradigm in packaging design.

I've seen some howlers in my time as both a retail store owner and a book cover designer, but they were always acknowledged and mitigated accordingly. The one time I saw a title missed of the spine entirely it was down to the fact that the cover designer chosen by an author because she was a friend, was a magazine designer who specialised in saddle stitched publications (stapled, folded) and completely forgot to incorporate the spine dimensions into her design before she proofed it with the author visually and then had it output to film. My company then handed off production to a printer's in the US who, fortunately, spotted the error prior to print which allowed us to graft in a black splice into the spine and reinsert the text and publisher's marque, but which left us with an ugly reminder and a story to tell the very tiny number of people who could never understand why we didn't take advantage of the full photographic wrap around that the front and back panels afforded.

Imagine if we'd have shipped those books out to retailers and wholesalers with just the solitary words on the spine : 'Collected Works'