The 3D is poor on this one.
I think the problem is the film itself is very dark. It's hard even to make out what's going on in certain parts (I had to rewind back to see what Chewie did to the guy in the elevator!)
Looks like they have one of those stupid green/blue filters on the cameras for most of the film.
I'm not sure if the regular BD is any different as I haven't watched that yet.
I had this problem when I saw the film in the theatre. Everything was so dark and it was hard to even see their faces most of the time.
I was really hoping it was the theatre or the projector or whatever. I was hoping that it would be better when I watched the blu-ray which I haven't done yet. Now I'm thinking it's going to be the same.
After seeing it in the theatre I read somewhere that it wasn't just my experience it was widespread but not at every theatre.
I don't know the technical stuff but something like not all theatre projectors are equipped to properly to project this film the way it was shot. Maybe newer theatres are or...I don't know. It has something to do with the way this film was made. I'm sure if you do a search...actually I just did a search and there are many articles and quotes by industry veterans and they were pissed.
‘Solo’ Theater Projection Problems Leave Fans In The Dark, Enrage Industry Veterans
Cinematographer Bradford Young's low-light cinematography highlights how many theaters no longer meet decades-old industry standards.
https://www.indiewire.com/2018/05/s...rojection-problems-bradford-young-1201969989/
The 3D is poor on this one.
I think the problem is the film itself is very dark. It's hard even to make out what's going on in certain parts (I had to rewind back to see what Chewie did to the guy in the elevator!)
Looks like they have one of those stupid green/blue filters on the cameras for most of the film.
I'm not sure if the regular BD is any different as I haven't watched that yet.
Yeah, the issue can't be with the theatres because the Blu Ray shouldn't be affected then also.I’m a manager at a movie theatre, and I work a lot with our projection system- so I feel like I have some sort of authority speaking about this.
*deep inhale*
Digital Cinema projection isn’t difficult- any length of actual work a “projectionist” would have to do in a traditional theatre has thus been removed and replaced with automation. While some theatres would have issue with the light levels for films, or even the entire projection system of films, these would be operational errors based on old hardware- much of what we view today is based on digital, and not analog systems. As a result of an entirely digital upgrade, Movies that are sent to theatres by Deluxe Technicolor have specific requirements, formatting, and technical applications- all of which, are sent to a theatre by Deluxe Technicolor. The only aspect that the theatre really has control over are what ads are placed before a feature- and when the lights dim and turn back on.
To assume that it is the fault of the theatre itself would only be applicable to a theatre that still projected the film on actual film. Otherwise, the lighting specifities are all quadruple checked by Disney Studios.
It is possible if there were an actual problem with the projector you were viewing the film on- specifically, if the light bulb in the projector were dying. Hopefully, however- any diligent theatre will keep a close eye on bulb hours and would replace the bulb should it ever exceed its half-life.
Yeah, the issue can't be with the theatres because the Blu Ray shouldn't be affected then also.
Here is the problem....
At the heart of this controversy is a disconnect between lax projection standards and a very specific creative agenda — namely, the work of “Solo” cinematographer Bradford Young, who is known for experimenting with low-light cinematography.
This bellend of a cinematographer who is trying to be all artsy fartsy!
The funny part is he was nominated for an Academy Award for Arrival....go figureI just realised he also did Arrival. Another film I also squinted my way through!
So he's definitely the problem!
I just realised he also did Arrival. Another film I also squinted my way through!
So he's definitely the problem!
Same here.I still haven't seen it. I want to. Now I'm worried.
I still haven't seen it. I want to. Now I'm worried.
I don't think it's as bad as Solo, but it's got that blue/green filter about it again.Same here.
Probably trying to hide the main actors face as he looked/sounded/acted nothing like Han Solo! (Remember, this is set only about 10 years before A New Hope!)Why do they have to make films so dark sometimes. I mean come on. Just turns me off when its hard to watch.
I still haven't seen it. I want to. Now I'm worried.
honestly, i hadn't noticed Arrival was overly dark. maybe it's my eyesight, or a blu ray upscale on a 4K system, but it didn't seem wrong to me - dark, yes, but not incorrect, if you see what i mean.Same here.
Probably trying to hide the main actors face as he looked/sounded/acted nothing like Han Solo! (Remember, this is set only about 10 years before A New Hope!)
Casting for this was a joke. I didn't feel at any time that I was watching Han Solo. More like a live action episode of Star Wars Rebels.
I wonder if the Lego Movie directors were fired for hiring him?!
Don't be so hard on yourself.I was so boring to watch. The production value was crap.