Attachments
Last edited by a moderator:
I have only seen the original. Since it is black/white, the cover does not represent anything in the film. It is disingenuous but forgivable to colorize stills of black/white movies for covers,but to use an non-movie image and a color one to boot is not right.
Seems like I'll have to see the remake someday based on the reaction here.
^
It is in color but I think the print most of the local affiliates always ran was Black and White for some reason and is the way I became used to seeing it as a kid.
The Fly 1958 was only shown in colour
Only way you saw it in black & white was on a black & white TV
The Fly 1958 been shown in cinemas was only in colour was never shown in black and white
Note The follow up films Return of the Fly 1959 and Curse of the Fly 1965 were made in black and white
You must be getting the films confused and was watching
The Return of the Fly 1959 or Curse of the Fly 1965
The original film has definitely been broadcast in the UK in black and white about 20-25 years go, because that's how I saw it. It was not on a black and white TV because we never owned one, and I haven't seen the sequels. It's a pretty memorable film so I'm not about to mix it up with them anyway.
Am I the only one who looks at that artwork and seesa womans bum as shes bent over, wearing fishnets and a thong...??
Once its seen, it can never be unseen...