28 Days Later (Blu-ray SteelBook) [UK]

paulboland

Contributor Steels/Arrow
Contributor
Premium Supporter
Sep 10, 2012
42,881
Navan/Ireland
Release Date: October 7th, 2013
Buy Links:
Amazon UK - {param} £11.95
Zavvi - £15.99
Sainsbury's - £12.99

91JeS-TipIL._SL500_.jpg


More artwork:
91JeS-TipIL._SL1500_.jpg

91B3%2Bp9OBXL._SL1500_.jpg

91QWtuvBAiL._SL1500_.jpg

Actual pictures: (Thanks to ricster)
 

Attachments

  • 91JeS-TipIL._SL500_.jpg
    91JeS-TipIL._SL500_.jpg
    58.2 KB · Views: 558
  • 91B3%2Bp9OBXL._SL500_.jpg
    91B3%2Bp9OBXL._SL500_.jpg
    52 KB · Views: 495
  • 91QWtuvBAiL._SL500_.jpg
    91QWtuvBAiL._SL500_.jpg
    56.3 KB · Views: 508
  • thumb.jpg
    thumb.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 441
Last edited by a moderator:
watched this for the first time last night thought it was great
but i thought the PQ was horrible for a film not even that old

it was shot on digital, one of the few films where owning it on bluray is no better than dvd, it is a very good film until the last 3rd where it does fall apart a bit.
 
Yeah, this movie marks the early days of digital filming. It definitely shows, but it makes it somewhat special at the same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skog
Some secens were shot on purpurse using a camcorder canon XL1

The director did this for a reason he wanted parts of the film to be low quality to suite the mood of the film scene that was been filmed
And is meant to be like that
He also for the blu-ray release refused any alteration of those secens and insisted it stay as is

This is discussed in the extras about making the film the use of the cameras
That's one of the reasons I always watch extras
You find out a lot about a film and film making process
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Skog and lgans316
Some secens were shot on purpurse using a camcorder canon XL1

The director did this for a reason he wanted parts of the film to be low quality to suite the mood of the film scene that was been filmed
And is meant to be like that
He also for the blu-ray release refused any alteration of those secens and insisted it stay as is

This is discussed in the extras about making the film the use of the cameras
That's one of the reasons I always watch extras
You find out a lot about a film and film making process

This.

Sometimes less is better. It's not a PQ issue, it was meant to look like that and when you know that, you sort of appreciate it.
 
just like Crash?

more info......


28 Days Later...*(2002)

The decision to film on DV (using Canon XL1 cameras) was both an aesthetic and a logistic choice. Aesthetically, Danny Boyle felt that the harshness of the DV imagery suited the post-apocalyptic urban landscape and the grittiness of the film in general. In the production notes, Boyle says "the general idea was to try and shoot as though we were survivors too." Logistically, producer Andrew Macdonald claims that shooting with standard cameras, especially some exterior scenes, would've been impossible. As MacDonald points out in the production notes, "The police and the local authorities were quite happy to assist us because we could set up scenes so quickly. We could literally be ready to shoot with a six-camera set-up within minutes - something we would not realistically have been able to do if shooting under the restrictions of 35mm which takes a good deal more time to set up a single shot."

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0289043/trivia?item=tr0755356