Last edited by a moderator:
Questa è la prima dimostrazione delle buffonate che vengono scritte senza alcuna conoscenza dei fatti. Presto verrà anche spiegata e dimostrata la posizione più che legittima di CM rispetto a Snolly Goster a cui rinnovo il mio apprezzamento per la qualità dell'artwork ma non per la condotta poco corretta nella fase di trattativa.Hasn’t stopped them before.
lmao and there it is
Hasn’t stopped them before.
lmao and there it
Hasn’t stopped them before.
lmao and there it is
think he is referring to snollygoster rather than the other person, well thats according to @wrecks reply lolI'm waiting for your answer.
think he is referring to snollygoster rather than the other person, well thats according to @wrecks reply lol
the general impression from things before could be summed up by gollum better, that would seem you rep before you by general consensus of things before
Asian release???????????Regarding Snolly Goster it will be demonstrated the non-prefessional conduct of this cpmpany on our agreement. They should apologize instead of worrying about the copyright when the same artwork was shared on this forum as frot of a full slip of an Asian release edition which they ignored the existence.
View attachment 535427
Incredible that you have a company in this field for years and you still seem to have absolutely no clue how copyright works lolOr we could talk about Red Bubble that sells the same artwork for € 13 while we were asked $ 1000 to use it
It was actually me that brought up the Alice Zhang that’s bingo artwork. Then shark was adding to it and also referring to Snollys art like Basil mentioned.I'm waiting for your answer.
uhm what? that first edition was made by wreck and snollgoster... thats no asian releaseit clearly refers to the "That's Bingo" internal artwork.
Regarding Snolly Goster it will be demonstrated the non-prefessional conduct of this cpmpany on our agreement. They should apologize instead of worrying about the copyright when the same artwork was shared on this forum as frot of a full slip of an Asian release edition which they ignored the existence.
View attachment 535427
Or we could talk about Red Bubble that sells the same artwork for € 13 while we were asked $ 1000 to use it, only to change their mind when we had already accepted the offer and commissioned a second artwork connected to this one.
View attachment 535428
shhh, let snolly and wreck ignore the existence of ituhm what? that first edition was made by wreck and snollgoster... thats no asian release
nah, he is just unaware that the ib rs-uce was made by wreck and snolly... instead he believes it is just some generic asian release... not sure i understand the rest but apparently hes now pissed that snollygoster supposedly didnt mind "the asian retailer" using his artwork, and doesnt understand why he has to pay money to use it and not that "asian retailer"I don't get it. Is Duckandrun saying someone's artwork was used on an HDN exclusive release without proper rights obtained?
nah, he is just unaware that the ib rs-uce was made by wreck and snolly... instead he believes it is just some generic asian release... not sure i understand the rest but apparently hes now pissed that snollygoster supposedly didnt mind "the asian retailer" using his artwork, and doesnt understand why he has to pay money to use it and not that "asian retailer"
lmao what ‘answer’ are you looking for? You guys have stolen artwork before. It’s well documented. You’ll never get rid of that stink.I'm waiting for your answer.
Why would they ADVERTISE it if it was illicit, though?