AM not ignoring China post but they would certainly not all go through the exact same sorting office on the exact sameness collection van then ontoward the exact same plane to get to their respectively countries. Too many variants.
What are you on about? They are likely being delivered to the same office before being sorted. It's a moot point though, not all are arriving with loose discs so this no longer matters.
You, however, ARE ignoring the point I raised twice of the postal service affecting so many copies in the EXACT same manor, PLUS the fact that the lower spindle holder take some some force to get the disc in an put, further addin*weight the probability of it not being simply ‘’knocked out in transit’
Whoever is responsible for the loose discs, whether it be the post or Blufans, wasn't consistent enough as we've had several with loose discs and several with (apparently) no loose discs... almost feels like a random occurrence.
When I said ALL I was referring to all affect copies. Not all produced. It appears you misunderstood me there’s,
So what was that your point about all copies you had received having loose discs? That it proved it was Blufans' doing?
Do you have you own copy? Try replicating any impact that could cause ALL 4 lower discs to come loose:
Yeah, no, that's not going to happen. I don't care to bang my copies that hard. But that doesn't mean it can't happen. All it means is I'm not willing to do it with my copies. You're welcome to send me one of yours and I'll bang away at it until I dislodge all discs from their hubs. I'm quite confident I can.
with no impact to the package - my one click box arrived immaculate yet all 6 discs were loose...
I'll state the obvious, but just because your package is immaculate it does not mean they carried it through multiple post offices, loading and unloading from one or more airplanes, and through one or more delivery vans and lorries on cotton balls. That you think your package didn't sustain any impacts because it looks like it's held up well is just funny and unreal.
No I didn't. I learn on my own by reading, your posts as well as others. Just because I don't agree with your hypothesis in general it doesn't mean I am not learning.
I provided logic, probability, experience and more, but you still wish to argue.
What's wrong with arguing and challenging hypothesis? Why does that bother you so much?
Your prerogative, but I know, beyond reasonable doubt that the issues were with BF QC as another tried telling you also.
Yes, I read that. If you know that beyond a reasonable doubt then that's great. I don't know that, and nothing you've written has brought me closer to that conclusion.
You kept pushing for answers so I replied out of politeness and in efforts to share myself experience/knowledge.
Thank you. You are very polite and I am too. I'm replying out of politeness as well. I am not only polite but also taking my time to quote you multiple times.
You are the one creating a mountain out of a molehill.
I disagree. I'm cool as a cucumber, the only reason this sparked was you and another member thought the best course of actiona was to blame Blufans (I don't actually care it's Blufans, that's not the point) that they were to blame for a few loose discs. There is no way you could prove that. That's my point. And that's not me making a mountain out of anything.
Seems you are becoming self-defensive so consider this my last reply on the matter.
I'm not even close to being self-defensive. I am being polite and engaging in conversation, which is, after all, what forums are for. Unless we can only post "cool pic", "when's the GB?", "my discs are loose"...
You asked, I, along with others answered, you pushed back and here we are.
This is getting ridiculous... how did I push back? Is pushing back the same as not agreeing with your theories?
It is by me, no problem! You seem to be willing to write back and forth until the other party doesn't agree with you, then you get defensive and dismissive.
Good day to you madam. 'Til we meet again in the next short-lived debate.
Started off strong earlier in your rattle debate 
but that's now 2 for 2 in quick succession from the threads I've just read.
What you got to lose!? You'll love it 
